|
|
马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。如果您注册时有任何问题请联系客服QQ: 83569622 。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册
x
做cost element plan时发现一COGS没建立成本要素(还有其它几个),US同事(indian 资深顾)下面解释,我很疑惑,怀疑这些鸟人在推卸责任,感觉有很多问题,请问你们的COGS建立了成本要素吗?P&L account不建立cost element肯定是无数据posting 到CO-PA,一不影响FI,二不影响CO-PA(costing-based),最多是一些CO报表无法看,也没啥,反正就是报表错误管理层那些鸟也看不动,未知各位的意见如何?
Hi Stone,
This GL account 62000000- COGS - cost element should never be created as a cost element becose
1. If we define COGS as a cost element then every transaction with this cost element will require a cost object assignmen t(i.e, a cost center, an internal order). Sice COGS account which wil be hit during PGI delivery every delivery transaction will require a cost center or an internal order and hence this in itself is a major problem. Even if we OKB9 configuration to have default cost center assigned to this 62000000 account this would result in creation of dummy cost centers and internal orders which would result in doubling of costs becose we would be recording the raw material and salary expenses twice since these were recorded as expenses on cost centers during production of prodcuts and would result in showing excess of expenses on the cost center reports and understating profitability.
2. We do not define COGS as a cost element when we use COPA since it is carried over to proftability by condition type VPRS (注意:我们使用了costing-based CO-PA)and creation of this GL as a cost element would result in errors in evaluation of profitability by segments.
Hence keeping all these factors in mind it is strongly recommended not to create COGS as a cost element. Once it is created it is not possible to delete this cost element and hence lead to many problems since this acccount is hit from all other modules. This is like opening a pandoras box of troubles.
Thanks,
该贴已经同步到 xiaoerp的微博 |
|